It would cost a lot less than £25 million to buy LCFC.
The £25 million being quoted as part of MM's bid includes money that would be loaned to the club after the takeover. So after the takeover we'll have more debts than we have now.
The £25 million being quoted as part of MM's bid includes money that would be loaned to the club after the takeover. So after the takeover we'll have more debts than we have now.
Only if we spend it:icon_razz. If he lends us 3-5 million and we can get promotion we wouldn't need his full loan.
Perhaps I'm missing something, but why would that neccessarily happen? It doesn't seem to have happened at Reading so why would it at Leicester?
The Madjeski belongs to Reading FC they ALLOW the London Irish to use it. There is no coownership, no rebranding, no bollocks!
As well as the £28,000,000 the club gets from being in the premiership?
What! Somebody buys the club and the club ends up with more debt!! Is MM related to the Glazers?
F*ck the F*cking Tigers, and there F**ing crap game. Egg chasing shower of sh*te.
I want to watch LCFC in LCFC's own football ground, even if they don't own it all yet! Sharing or being owned by the tigers by the back door is unacceptable. If it goes ahead I will never set foot in the ground again and I will do all I can to discourage everyone I know to do the same (but I can guarantee that they will not need much pursuation).
If safeguarding our future is selling half of the ground to someone else making us forever more undesirable then I want no part of the future of this club.
What about Wigan?
Hull?
They've looked like football grounds when I've been there.
F*ck the F*cking Tigers, and there F**ing crap game. Egg chasing shower of sh*te.
I want to watch LCFC in LCFC's own football ground, even if they don't own it all yet! Sharing or being owned by the tigers by the back door is unacceptable. If it goes ahead I will never set foot in the ground again and I will do all I can to discourage everyone I know to do the same (but I can guarantee that they will not need much pursuation).
If safeguarding our future is selling half of the ground to someone else making us forever more undesirable then I want no part of the future of this club.
Wasn't aware you were so up for the idea Webbo.
Is there a logical reason for this, or is it purely based on emotion?
Were you attacked by a tiger as a child?
I didn't say I am up for the idea.
But if it's done the right way it makes financial sense, and opposition to it seems to be based mostly on an irrational hatred of the egg chasers rather than any genuine reason why it's bad for the club.
And with the groundshare making financial sense it could be that any future investor (including MM) could see it as the way forward.
There is a logical reason yes, I am an LCFC fan, if I wanted to have any emotional connection to the Tigers I would go and watch them play in THEIR stadium. I don't, so I don't bother. I am a LCFC fan so I go and watch them in their stadium as it should be. I don't want to rebrand and I want the club to be as attractive as possible to future investment.
Yeah, nice rant. That seems like the 20th time I've read it tonight so I guess you've made your position clear. But what makes us more undesirable - a ground part owned by the rugby c*nts or a shed load of debt? Say £35 million - because that looks an option for the Mandaric bid.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |