Mawsley
Well-Known Member
Is anyone stupid enough to read anything in the daily mail or click on a link to any of their content without expecting a steaming pile of shit?
Yes.
Is anyone stupid enough to read anything in the daily mail or click on a link to any of their content without expecting a steaming pile of shit?
You lost to Peterborough ha ha ha at home ha ha ha. You're biggest issue now is that when you sack Bruce you'll want Pearson back but he's not that desperate this time round.and Greggs
Ok so the 5 games have now passed. We have gone from the truly woeful against Burton to a side that looks like it could have a real chance. What has changed?
Ok so the 5 games have now passed. We have gone from the truly woeful against Burton to a side that looks like it could have a real chance. What has changed?
Ok so the 5 games have now passed. We have gone from the truly woeful against Burton to a side that looks like it could have a real chance. What has changed?
I agree. We played pretty well at 'Boro, but I thought we played pretty well in the other away games as well. Sometimes you get the rub of the green, sometimes you don't.We started to get a bit of luck that we didn't get in the opening games...
Well, half way through the Burnley match, he abandoned his deranged reliance on the 4-4-2 formation and it hasn't been seen since. About three games too late, but at least he saw sense.
Also, St.Ledger alongside Morgan have been far more solid and reliable defensively. Plus, the actual and potential impact of Knockaert has caused opposition problems that created space for others. Plus the strikers have started scoring.
I still see a number of things wrong with the side, but there are significantly fewer now than a couple of weeks ago.
We will have to evolve again when Knockaert is targetted. Would be nice for Marshall to find some form.
If you have a look as well including Tuesday's fixture, we have played 5 of 7 in the top 8 of the table. Alongside that 3 of 12 opponents in the bottom half of the table.
It may be me being a bit thick but what is 5 of 7 in the top 8 ???
It may be me being a bit thick but what is 5 of 7 in the top 8 ???
It's classic Hazzish, it's not supposed to make any sense
We are one of the top 8. Hence 5 out of 7 possible opponents.
We've not played Cardiff, Brighton or Huddersfield. We've only played 4 of the top 8, Wolves, Blackburn, Blackpool and Hull (who we battered 3-1).
It may be me being a bit thick but what is 5 of 7 in the top 8 ???
I guess he is referring to us playing five of the top 8. As one of them is us, that means we have played 5 of the 7 teams in the top 8 we could have played
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |