I think they found that exact phrase written on the back of the Dead Sea Scrolls.Dodgy as **** that Man Utd game......
It’s the rule that’s dodgy. Penalties are basically a guaranteed goal these days. If takers are going to be stuttering and jumping in their run-ups, keepers should be allowed to move where they like at the start of the run-up, not when the ball is struck.Dodgy as **** that Man Utd game......
It’s the rule that’s dodgy. Penalties are basically a guaranteed goal these days. If takers are going to be stuttering and jumping in their run-ups, keepers should be allowed to move where they like at the start of the run-up, not when the ball is struck.
Oh yeah, that’s a penalty 101% of the time, no idea what he imagines he saw in the replay.Agree on that. The decision to overturn the West Brom pen is the dodgy bit. Not sure why he didn't just avoid giving it to begin with.
Oh yeah, that’s a penalty 101% of the time, no idea what he imagines he saw in the replay.
Was thinking that. The way Fernandes takes that penalty makes staying on the line almost impossible. Keeper was miles off on the retake too.It’s the rule that’s dodgy. Penalties are basically a guaranteed goal these days. If takers are going to be stuttering and jumping in their run-ups, keepers should be allowed to move where they like at the start of the run-up, not when the ball is struck.
It’s absolutely part of the plan. Means he gets two goes if the first one doesn’t work because the keeper has already moved. Bit like “clever” tax accouting - not illegal, but he’s still a **** for doing itWas thinking that. The way Fernandes takes that penalty makes staying on the line almost impossible. Keeper was miles off on the retake too.
Yeah he used to write for the Daily Mail, bound to be a wankerWhat an absolute Kunt that bloke is.
I read that and what’s funny is the longer we go on without fans being able to go to stadiums, the less bothered they’ll be about returning. I think there’s probably some form of interest curve but if you offered me a ticket to a LCFC game now for £55... I’m not sure I’d be interested enough. There, I said it.Chelski charging £75 for tickets vs Leeds
Jesus. There is no opposition or occasion, save for maybe a European final, that could persuade me to part with £55 for a single match ticket.I read that and what’s funny is the longer we go on without fans being able to go to stadiums, the less bothered they’ll be about returning. I think there’s probably some form of interest curve but if you offered me a ticket to a LCFC game now for £55... I’m not sure I’d be interested enough. There, I said it.
Anyone else feeling this way?
They're both Kuntz then.Yeah he used to write for the Daily Mail, bound to be a wanker
Most tickets are £45 ish now. I’m not sure I’d be interested for that either tbhJesus. There is no opposition or occasion, save for maybe a European final, that could persuade me to part with £55 for a single match ticket.
Jesus. There is no opposition or occasion, save for maybe a European final, that could persuade me to part with £55 for a single match ticket.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |