Premier League 2020-21

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fortunately for us the people who appointed a non manager at Chelsea are still there.

Imo the appointment was an insult to managers who have worked there ass off at this level and below.

FL has **** all experience, **** all achievement and no ****ing idea what he's doing, a job that was thoroughly undeserved.
 
Lako42 said:
Fortunately for us the people who appointed a non manager at Chelsea are still there.

Imo the appointment was an insult to managers who have worked there ass off at this level and below.

FL has **** all experience, **** all achievement and no ****ing idea what he's doing, a job that was thoroughly undeserved.
Click to expand...
But thankfully, very good news for the rest of the teams looking to finish in the top 4 to 6.
 
mabrah said:
oh don't start ;)

I suspect Frankie was the peoples choice, a sentimental selection, rather than one based on cold managerial acumen. Without disrespecting him (though believe me, that'd come both easily and naturally to me) he'd only come from Derby. Not like it was Celtic or anything... oh, hang on... umm....

Whatever, yep, I can see his days being numbered.
Click to expand...
Betting on him replacing Lennon? And the media having a spaff fest on Gerrard vs Lampard?
 
Lako42 said:
Fortunately for us the people who appointed a non manager at Chelsea are still there.

Imo the appointment was an insult to managers who have worked there ass off at this level and below.

FL has **** all experience, **** all achievement and no ****ing idea what he's doing, a job that was thoroughly undeserved.
Click to expand...

that’s right.

I was thinking: who would hire Lampard if Chelsea sacked him? Surely nobody of note, so why on earth is he qualified to manage Chelsea.

Same with Ole.
 
Quite a bit of genuine pressure building for old Frank, according to the Chelsea writers in The Athletic.
 
Miles Away said:
that’s right.

I was thinking: who would hire Lampard if Chelsea sacked him? Surely nobody of note, so why on earth is he qualified to manage Chelsea.

Same with Ole.
Click to expand...
Ole's achievements in Norway were very impressive, so he earned the opportunity at least - which Lampard did not. I'm increasingly finding it hard to say Ole's done a bad job too
 
jb5000 said:
Ole's achievements in Norway were very impressive, so he earned the opportunity at least - which Lampard did not. I'm increasingly finding it hard to say Ole's done a bad job too
Click to expand...

Don’t entirely disagree. Still, would you fancy him in charge of Leicester? Not for me.
 
****ing tiresome isn't it?

Pundits a month ago = "Chelsea...genuine title challengers?" Pundits today = "Chelsea...club in crisis?"

It was exactly the ****ing same with Spurs a month earlier. Now Spurs have won a game it'll soon be back to being a title challenge.

All about Man U now...until they lose 2 on the spin then they'll be washed up & hopeless.

Surely it must be about time to sack all of these ****ing idiots & just put some cartoons on?
 
give_us_a_wave said:
****ing tiresome isn't it?

Pundits a month ago = "Chelsea...genuine title challengers?" Pundits today = "Chelsea...club in crisis?"

It was exactly the ****ing same with Spurs a month earlier. Now Spurs have won a game it'll soon be back to being a title challenge.

All about Man U now...until they lose 2 on the spin then they'll be washed up & hopeless.

Surely it must be about time to sack all of these ****ing idiots & just put some cartoons on?
Click to expand...
I can’t do it anymore. If I don’t read about it on here I’m pretty much unaware of what’s going on outside of Leicester.
 
tedfoxxx said:
I can’t do it anymore. If I don’t read about it on here I’m pretty much unaware of what’s going on outside of Leicester.
Click to expand...

Same here tother than articles about Xg. How am I supposed to tell who the better team was without that?
 
give_us_a_wave said:
****ing tiresome isn't it?

Pundits a month ago = "Chelsea...genuine title challengers?" Pundits today = "Chelsea...club in crisis?"

It was exactly the ****ing same with Spurs a month earlier. Now Spurs have won a game it'll soon be back to being a title challenge.

All about Man U now...until they lose 2 on the spin then they'll be washed up & hopeless.

Surely it must be about time to sack all of these ****ing idiots & just put some cartoons on?
Click to expand...
Superlative journalism, since no one appears to have the attention span that someone is doing “ok”
 
In all seriousness, how can it be right to close everything except key services and allow football to continue?

Especially with the bunch of wankers in several PL clubs that have been flagrantly defying the existing rules over recent weeks without any kind of punishment.

It doesn't sit well with me.

I'd also say that the chances of us resuming our EL campaign in six weeks are no more than 50/50.

 
Brown Nose said:
how can it be right to close everything except key services and allow football to continue?
Click to expand...

That's not what's happening, and that's not what happened in the first lockdown.
Anyone who can't work at home can continue to go to work. There will be people working in offices, factories and warehouses etc just like there was last spring. Some will decide to close, but others will continue as normal.

Football had already stopped before the first lockdown, but I don't think there was any legal reason why they couldn't have continued, with no crowds.
 
Elite sport is exempt from the new restrictions - all other organised sport is done with
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top