M17TT C
Well-Known Member
Darth Vodka said:to be fair, in my uni years i was wasted by this time *every* friday
in fact, not just fridays really
well im sure that they were very proud days for you and your family
Last edited:
Darth Vodka said:to be fair, in my uni years i was wasted by this time *every* friday
in fact, not just fridays really
matt_c0nn0lly said:well im sure that they were very proud days for you and your family
Darth Vodka said:and i'm sure your mum has got
"my son is a drug user FCUK THE POLICE!! "
on her mantlepiece
OK, i told you to get fooked and then I had to go into a short meeting. So I apologise for the delaymatt_c0nn0lly said:and that makes your previous post look so much better, i mean i am struggling to reply to this as you have just proven that me posting anything has no relevance and should not be read by anyone as you have just backed up it up with some pure genious reasons.
or would it be better if i wrote it in a language that you understood more as you seem to be around here quite regularly:
0100010011110101010011010010101010101010100010111101010101010101010
1010101010101011100110101010001000111101010101010101010101010101010
1010101010101000101110101010101010100011111010101010101010101010101
matt_c0nn0lly said:well no she hasn't, i never realised that having a quote from your favourite tv program resulted in you becoming a pointless scumbag whos opinions have no value whatsoever
Melton Fox said:CV's
Of course, no apostrafeee on a plural :icon_confDarth Vodka said:CVs
i'd have binned your CV for that
no really, i am going the pub now
Melton Fox said:OK, i told you to get fooked and then I had to go into a short meeting. So I apologise for the delay
I shall keep this short. After years of reading CV's and application letters etc you begin to spot an imbecile from a mile away. As such you don't even read the letters that look like they may have been written by imbecile. Consequentially, you sometimes may miss a good applicant, because they come across in their application as an imbecile.
As a nett result of this mentality, I saw your post and presumed that it was written by an imbecile. The way i figure it is this; Why on earth would I want to know the opinion of an imbecile?
Maybe you are not an imbecile, in which case some might say that I should have given your post the obvious time and attention that it took for you to write it. In which case I apologise.
But it still doesn't change the fact that you look like an imbecile, and I still won't be reading your post as it looks to much like hard work.
Presentation my friend, if you wish to be taken seriously, look serious.
Melton Fox said:Of course, no apostrafeee on a plural :icon_conf
Darth Vodka said:my favourite TV programme is South Park and i don't recognise the quote?
did you mean to say "my favourite"
in fact, did you mean to say "programme"
and while i'm at it, did you mean to say "whose"
lack of carriage return/line feed and bad spelling are your trade mark. not studying English are you?
off down the pub now to spend a tiny bit of my bonus, ta ra
PONTUS KAAMARK said:Anyway.......
Back to the original thread.
We are discussing Smith and some people have questioned his temperment and enthusiasim for LCFC.
I Smith did alright for Leicester. I really dont see how we could question him at all. There was nothing that directly happened that could lead you too such an asumption.
He did well to begin with and tailed off a little and Kelly is probably right hes a little to experienced for the current situation but in no way could you really knock him if you do your as bad as Thircan!
PONTUS KAAMARK said:Sorry theres some horendous typos there! You no what I mean though!
Did I call you an imbecile?. Sorry, i don't recall it. I implied that you looked like one.matt_c0nn0lly said:ok mate well done, you read cv's for maccys or something but i just think that some people tend to take a bit more care over a CV than they do writting a message on an internett forum, as some people regard these things as having a slightly different importance. i certainly do but you seem to think that these are a good comparison.
and the fact that you call me an imbecile without even reading what i have wrote and stating this quite clearly makes you my friend the bigger imbecile as you are still to back up your opionions with any reasons, i think your employee may have read a few porky pies on your CV if your claims to have an aurthorative position at work are true
Melton Fox said:Did I call you an imbecile?. Sorry, i don't recall it. I implied that you looked like one.
Did I also say that I thought you were an imbecile becasue of what you wrote? Sorry, i don't recall it. My gripe was the presentation of what you wrote
Me, claim to have an authorative position at work? I own the company my friend.
Why would an employee have read my CV?
Back up my opinions without any reason. As you clearly state that you are not imbecile, I am surprised you didn't read my post earlier in the thread
Melton Fox said:Did I call you an imbecile?. Sorry, i don't recall it. I implied that you looked like one.
Did I also say that I thought you were an imbecile becasue of what you wrote? Sorry, i don't recall it. My gripe was the presentation of what you wrote
Me, claim to have an authorative position at work? I own the company my friend.
Why would an employee have read my CV?
Back up my opinions without any reason. As you clearly state that you are not imbecile, I am surprised you didn't read my post earlier in the thread
matt_c0nn0lly said:ok so you say i look like an imbecile without ever seeing me, even better. Not physically you pedantic twat, you are getting on my nerves now
'After years of reading CV's and application letters etc you begin to spot an imbecile from a mile away. As such you don't even read the letters that look like they may have been written by imbecile.'
pretty much implying it there. Exactly what I just said. I "Implied" it.
my gripe is the fact the you seem to think a CV and a post on an internet forum merit good comparison, and taht you still say you havent read what i have wrote and beleive that i still look like an imbecile without, 1) seeing me and 2) not readin what i say Are you so fookin' stupid you can't understand what I am saying?. I haven't read your post, and I don't intend to read your post because it looks like an imbecile wrote it. Nothing to do with the it's contents. They may be valid. But I am not prepared to trawl through it, just to find it may have been written by an imbecile
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
7 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
8 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
9 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
10 | Brighton | 21 | 31 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 21 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 21 | 6 |