Terry Robinson - Gone

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
But as Rudkin is not a pal of Top with no football experience, then Pearson should be OK. Yes?
Have I mentioned the fact you're bottom of the league, 5 points off safety, where we were above the relegation places on 17 points at the same juncture?
 
It's a dark e, a ****ing dark e, geddit?


I don't know why I bother, my comedy genius is wasted on you shower of bus wankers

You see, where you went wrong Mackster is that you failed to test this on a number of different platforms :icon_wink
 
Maybe he 'laid some cable' in Top's car.

It's the only possible reason
 
Fact is we signed a load of shit, and nowhere near enough quality for what was needed. Despite what some may think I think the owners are going to spend money in January, in a last desperate throw of the dice. If they think Robinson was in some way responsible, then they weren't going to let him feck it up again. I genuinely don't know if he was to blame in any way, but he's got the push for some reason and that seems the most plausible -

Agree on your first point and have been saying so from the outset - tho not in your eloquent language.

On spending money in January - I will be very surprised. It certainly wouldn't make much business sense - that said, football isn't a rational business so you never know. Just a thought on Pearson - the fans are suffering massive disappointment/ disillusion made stronger by the astonishing start to the season. The rest of the season looks bleak. Why should Pearson just be pushed out to walk away with a shed load of money? Let him stay and try to make the best of it. I don't think that he can manage in the Premier League - but he's proven he can bring promotion.
 
Have I mentioned the fact you're bottom of the league, 5 points off safety, where we were above the relegation places on 17 points at the same juncture?



Is that relevant to the question of whether Pearson will stay or go?
 
Fact is we signed a load of shit, and nowhere near enough quality for what was needed. Despite what some may think I think the owners are going to spend money in January, in a last desperate throw of the dice. If they think Robinson was in some way responsible, then they weren't going to let him feck it up again. I genuinely don't know if he was to blame in any way, but he's got the push for some reason and that seems the most plausible - either that or he's just an obnoxious racialistical cock



Also plausible would be the notion that Top and his dad have made it clear inside the club that they want to continue with Pearson and that Robinson has been shooting his mouth off about the decision. I understand that neither of them had much time for the other.
 
Have I mentioned the fact you're bottom of the league, 5 points off safety, where we were above the relegation places on 17 points at the same juncture?

Have I reminded you just how much better Swansea are than Cardiff? :icon_wink
 
Probably more relevant than your point.



I wasn't making a point. I was replying to your effort of trying to liken the situation here to the ridiculousness of what went on at your place a little while ago. The two things are not the same, with our owners not seeming to tend towards the irrational.
 
Yes. But but as you're 12 points behind them, that doesn't help Nige now does it?


It would not seem to do so if his future was directly linked to our present league position. There is though a body of opinion that suggests that it should not be. Our owners have done nothing to suggest that they don't share this view.
 
I wasn't making a point. I was replying to your effort of trying to liken the situation here to the ridiculousness of what went on at your place a little while ago. The two things are not the same, with our owners not seeming to tend towards the irrational.
You were making the point that the two things are not the same with your retorical question.

What's rational about keeping a manager, who has you bottom of the Premier league, adrift by 5 points, with the only opportunity to use their money to strengthen the club just around the corner?
 
It would not seem to do so if his future was directly linked to our present league position. There is though a body of opinion that suggests that it should not be. Our owners have done nothing to suggest that they don't share this view.
Nigel's future should not be linked to your league position?
This is a wind up, right?
 
You were making the point that the two things are not the same with your retorical question.

What's rational about keeping a manager, who has you bottom of the Premier league, adrift by 5 points, with the only opportunity to use their money to strengthen the club just around the corner?


You've not been listening, have you?
 
Nigel's future should not be linked to your league position?
This is a wind up, right?


You've not been listening, have you?
 
You were making the point that the two things are not the same with your retorical question.

What's rational about keeping a manager, who has you bottom of the Premier league, adrift by 5 points, with the only opportunity to use their money to strengthen the club just around the corner?

Well actually there is a strong rationale.

I accept that our position is more or less beyond help for this season so there is every sense in the focus being on next season and who is most likely to get us promoted. I quite understand that the theory is better than the practice and in reality a losing manager inevitably has to go. nevertheless there is sense in keeping Pearson to do what he is good at - then being hard headed and getting rid.

You seem surprising obsessed with drawing parallels with CCFC. Don't think that works when taken to extremes. Cardif seemed to implode partly for non-football related reasons which are not transferable to Leicester's miserable plight. I guess you are in a prolonged bout of post-relegation angst. Understandable - but realistically Cardif have been a mainly second tier outfit - Leicester's history is a bit better than that. No offence intended.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top