LeeCovFox
Well-Known Member
Can I ask those that question if he knows what type of player is needed for this level; he has managed and been successful in several countries, in several leagues and for several different international teams. Are you arguing that they all needed the same type of player and that the championship is alone in its style?
A fair question. For me personally I think it may be that he has forgotten (for want of a better word) how to be an exceptional club manager. He has done it what? For one season in the last decade or so before coming here? At international level he has been tasked with picking the most talented of a particular pool of players and making them perform well as a team. Relatively simple in recruitment terms - he can pick who he likes as long as they're of a particular nationality.
I know that people will point to his time at Manchester City. And he did do well there. But those who have said he was 'fantastic' are being generous. He was given more financial backing than his predecessors and he made a decent fist of it. If he had been given more time then I reckon he would have done even better. And that's all I'm arguing for here, really. I do not believe he should be sacked. I just don't think he will do the job he has been tasked with given the parameters within which he must work. I think the naivety of the owners in setting such lofty objectives without much time to achieve them is the biggest problem. I doubt very much Eriksson would have spunked the cash he did in the summer had he been given a bit longer to attain the goals of the owners. He could have built a side more gradually and I'd personally be more confident of success.
Last edited: