Profondo Rosso
Well-Known Member
My belief in Eriksson's ability to get us promoted is fast disappearing. Like many others I have for weeks being bemoaning our lack of creativity and width. Nobody in the midfield seems willing (or perhaps able) to move into space. We get to the final third of the pitch and the movement stops. I never feel that we are going to score when we go forward. We are entirely predictable. The most frustrating aspect of this for me is that Eriksson is well capable of getting us playing fast, fluid, attacking football.
There was a spell last season during which I felt we would score every time we attacked. From which I can only conclude that he has gone this way by choice. I rate Eriksson highly as a manager. But I really don't think he has what it takes to get us promoted as things stand. But I don't advocate sacking him just yet. As much as failing to win promotion would rightly be regarded as abject failure (given our expenditure), I don't see who else is available that could turn is into a potent attacking force with the current personnel.
I also think that there are problems at the club which run far deeper than that which manifests itself on the pitch. There is a problem of attitudes at the club, starting from the very top. The owners have clearly meant well, and haven't hesitated to spend their money. Unfortunately their approach is naive in the extreme. Spending money alone will not bring about success. And nor is combining such spending with the biggest name managers available necessarily a recipe for glory. I should declare my interest by admitting that I have always been cynical about these owners anyway. I dislike what they have brought to the club and I think that eventually they will become fed up and leave us in real financial trouble. But that aside, I believe that they need to change their approach.
If it is true that before their arrival they demanded the replacement of Nigel Pearson by Paulo Sousa in spite of the former's success here, then I'm afraid that speaks volumes for their lack of knowledge of the game. Even if that is not true the appointment of Eriksson suggests to me that they are easily seduced by football's celebrities ahead of managers who have a history of sustained (relative) success in English football (I believe Eriksson was an excellent England manager, but international football is a different animal to club football). Fortunately such attitudes can change. If Eriksson fails they may well learn that the fame of a prospective manager is not the most important consideration. I certainly hope so.
Pretty much my thoughts spot on. As said earlier, I like Eriksson and want him to do well, but really, for the situation we are in I'm just not sure he's suited and, in this division, I'd take Pearson back in a heart beat. The problem is, I really can't see our owners wanting anyone other than a big name manager and if Eriksson were to go I could only see us making another big name "celebrity" appointment who will have absolutely no knowledge of the players and teams in this division, rather than someone of a Pearson/Coppell/Warnock ilk who know this division inside out.
Last edited: