SilverFox
Well-Known Member
My cat... by mistake it would probably achieve something tactically right.And replace him with?
My cat... by mistake it would probably achieve something tactically right.And replace him with?
Why wait. It very obviously is never going to improve.I have defended Puel for a long time as I felt the changes he has tried to make were the right ones, and I was willing to be patient. While I still feel that making our tactics more adaptable and developing young players are the right steps, I no longer have faith in Puel to make these changes sufficiently well to match our ambitions, and even I have struggled to understand many of his recent decisions, to the point where I think he has lost confidence himself.
That said I also think he has suffered like our last couple of managers from a poor recruitment team, and this is perhaps an even more important area that the club should be looking at.
I honestly don't know who would be better, but I think the wrong appointment now could ruin the club, so I don't support change for the sake of it. While we won't match our ambitions, I don't currently fear relegation so as long as that remains the case perhaps the summer is a more sensible to time to make the needed changes.
And replace him with?
It has been a load of ****ing shite since May. Seriously, how much more time will we waste with this guy?
Sacked half the players, no. Changed half the players from that regular starting team to those generally considered first-choice players now, yes.It’s been a load of shit since May 2016, have we sacked half the players yet?
If you sack a manager and don’t have a plan to replace him it is a really stupid move so yes my question is relevant
I mean the same person(s) who didn’t go with any of the above named managers when they, for better or worse, appointed Ranieri and Puel.you mean the same person that chose Puel ands recommended him to the owners?
It’s been a load of shit since May 2016, have we sacked half the players yet?
It’s been a load of shit since May 2016, have we sacked half the players yet?
Although I understand what you are saying BN I have to disagree.I never wanted Puel and never thought his appointment would work out. However, I'm more in the camp now that a change mid-season is a bit pointless.
The last two seasons, we've finished with 44 and 47 points. We'll almost certainly do the same this year too. Just too good to get embroiled in a relegation battle but not good enough for anything else. Tediously average.
What exactly would changing Puel for any likely candidate achieve? Maybe 50 points, maybe even 55? Does that really matter? We might as well let Puel dither and drip along now.
In summer 2017, we should have thanked Shakespeare for his stabilising job and appointed a hungry, innovative young coach. We bottled it. In summer 2018, we should have thanked Puel for his stabilising job and appointed a hungry, innovative young coach. We bottled it.
For me, it's all about planning and preparing to make the change we've needed to do at the third opportunity in summer 2019. We need to find the right candidate, and have him primed and ready to walk in before the end of May.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |