Mawsley
Well-Known Member
I loved scrolling down to this. :icon_lol:
Richard & Andy
- Thread starter Mawsley
- Start date
- Status
I loved scrolling down to this. :icon_lol:
David Gwilliam
Well-Known Member
The person I would like to see sacked is the one who posted that YouTube video. There is someone at Sky who is out to get a colleague and they are poison in any organisation.
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
Maybe not, but just because there's a special type of idiot woman that makes retarded, thoughtless comments doesn't excuse Andy Gray's plainly offensive behaviour.
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
Yes, everyone should cover for everyone else. No mistakes should be highlighted, all theft, fraud, bullying, threatening behaviour etc should be swept under the carpet. Pretend it doesn't happen. That'll make everything ok.
Mawsley
Well-Known Member
Offensive?
Priests sticking their cocks into alter boys and police chiefs wanking themselves to photos of naked 6 year olds - that kind of stuff could be described as offensive.
Andy Gray is, was and always will be a ****ing idiot - and there is now a widespread understanding of that.
Hardly offensive.
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
What a bizarre pair of comparisons. Now I get the message. Misogyny and crass sexual bullying in the workplace are ok. Now I get it.
Mawsley
Well-Known Member
Obviously not.
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
Do you want to explain why it's not offensive then?
Tip: think carefully about the question and answer what has actually been asked. Try to avoid talking about kiddy fiddling if it's not relevant.
Go :thumbs_up
David Gwilliam
Well-Known Member
What you are referring to are not mistakes and do need to be dealt with.
The impression is that Keys and Rednapp had a good relationship and I see no evidence that Jamie was offended. The decision by someone to put it on YouTube at a time when Richard Keys career is known to be vulnerable is a very big deal and simply malicious..
It is noticeable that we do not know who put it on YouTube and one thing I am always uneasy about is anonymity. If I was working at Sky I would not trust anyone who did that to a colleague.
LeeCovFox
Well-Known Member
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
Brilliant
GazLCFC
Active Member
Brilliant
Confirmed on SSN now!
:icon_lol:
Macky
Gruntled Member
Well, we can certainly narrow it down. Obviously it was a man because a scatty woman wouldn't have been able to do anything as technical as post it up there
NN Fox
Well-Known Member
Is the money any good?
Siouxsie
Moderator
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/jan/26/andy-gray-richard-keys-sixist
According to this and other reports I've read it seems there would be a number of people willing to do that to those 2.
It does sound like this has been used as a very convenient excuse by the management.
David Gwilliam
Well-Known Member
I do not trust that story one bit. Three people from a huge organisation give their view anonymously and that is taken to reflect the general concensus. If they actually exist to attack former colleagues by name without being willing to give yours seems to me to show a total lack of integrity.
Personally I would trust football pundits more than I would journalists for any national newspaper. The only journalists I trust work for "Country Life" magazine which comes out on Wednesday. To my surprise today's issue has not covered this story at all.
Feriol
Well-Known Member
I expect it's more defence than attack.
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
You're saying that they should allow themselves to be identified and make themselves targets for further abuse / bullying / victimisation by people who sympathise with those two cretins?
spionfox
Well-Known Member
I'm looking forward to the next issue of Private Eye myself.
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 6 | 15 |
| 2 | Manchester C | 6 | 14 |
| 3 | Arsenal | 6 | 14 |
| 4 | Chelsea | 6 | 13 |
| 5 | Aston Villa | 5 | 12 |
| 6 | Fulham | 6 | 11 |
| 7 | Newcastle | 6 | 11 |
| 8 | Brighton | 6 | 9 |
| 9 | Nottm F | 6 | 9 |
| 10 | Tottenham | 5 | 7 |
| 11 | Manchester U | 5 | 7 |
| 12 | Brentford | 6 | 7 |
| 13 | Bournemouth | 5 | 5 |
| 14 | West Ham | 6 | 5 |
| 15 | Everton | 6 | 4 |
| 16 | Leicester | 6 | 3 |
| 17 | Palace | 6 | 3 |
| 18 | Ipswich | 5 | 3 |
| 19 | Southampton | 5 | 1 |
| 20 | Wolves | 6 | 1 |
