weluvulesta
New Member
MON knows what he's doing, I have a gut feeling that he ill go, and MON will get the best out of him, which I feel will be a developed and decent RB or maybe even CB within 2/3 years.
I would rather have Sorensen.Is everyone overlooking the fact Stuart Taylor is crap?
I would rather have Sorensen.
He might.Sorensen would never come here.
Graham Fenton. :icon_wink
leicester is in europe
Who've we got in the next round? Another tricky trip to Madrid?
ok in that case it was p**s poor marking/defending/doing his job.
If potential is aimlessly lumping the ball up field to noone in particular, giving the ball away consistantly, and lacking any key footballing skills like passing, moving and heading, then i potentially have bags of potential!!!
The names of each member who has slated Stearman should be noted because, I am willing to bet that, if O'Neill takes him, he will be a Premiership star in a couple of years. When this happens, how many of the same names will be decrying the lack of ambition of the City board selling their young talent for peanuts?
That's fine, bung me on.The names of each member who has slated Stearman should be noted because, I am willing to bet that, if O'Neill takes him, he will be a Premiership star in a couple of years. When this happens, how many of the same names will be decrying the lack of ambition of the City board selling their young talent for peanuts?
That's fine, bung me on.
By the same token - can we have a list of names of all of those who still reckon that Richard Stearman hasn't pissed on his chips by trading in his hunger to develop for the luxury of fat pay packets, fast cars and fit birds?
This way, when he joins the long list of 'where are they now considering they had huge potential' we can point and laugh in a smug and annoying manner.
Actually, having re-read this post, it will be Stearman that laughs loudest and longest at those of us who allow him his life of excess and ineptitude.
The club previously turned down a £1.5m bid, pre Milan when we would need the money far more than now.
He now has much more first team experience, so in theory wouldn't the asking price have increased?
The club previously turned down a £1.5m bid, pre Milan when we would need the money far more than now.
He now has much more first team experience, so in theory wouldn't the asking price have increased?
If the dumbass money being paid by City for fat, old and/or crap forwards is anything to go by......so in theory wouldn't the asking price have increased?
why did we make a loss on Akinbadbuy then?
Because no one had previously made a decent offer for him.
If Villa thought he was worth £1.5 million a year ago, and they still want him, why should we now accept a lower price?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 23 | 56 |
2 | Arsenal | 23 | 47 |
3 | Nottm F | 24 | 47 |
4 | Manchester C | 23 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 24 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 24 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 24 | 37 |
9 | Fulham | 24 | 36 |
10 | Brighton | 24 | 34 |
11 | Brentford | 23 | 31 |
12 | Manchester U | 23 | 29 |
13 | Palace | 23 | 27 |
14 | West Ham | 23 | 27 |
15 | Everton | 23 | 26 |
16 | Tottenham | 23 | 24 |
17 | Wolves | 24 | 19 |
18 | Leicester | 24 | 17 |
19 | Ipswich | 24 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 24 | 9 |