From Gradel to Grave
Active Member
Interesting post
Thanks!
Interesting post
It's not like Boc to avoid the question.
Actually he avoided one on Tuesday night by pretending to be asleep, but I can understand him not wanting to answer :icon_bigg
It was the middle of the ****ing night. Questions such as fried or boiled can wait until the morning!
Everybody will know that Nigel Pearson has been irked by many of the questions put to him by Ian Stringer for some time. It is my understanding that the final straw came in the first half of the game at Pride Park when in commentary IS questioned the reason for NP's absence from the bench/technical area and for some time suggested that he wasn't at the game at all. I can't remember his exact words and in a way his exact words are not important; listeners were left with the clear impression that IS considered that the team's lack of performance was down to the absence of NP. As it turned out, NP *was* at the game and apparently had good reason not to be in the technical area at that time. I thought at the time that IS was going over-the-top about it; clearly NP agrees in spades.
I see Chris Grayling didn't spoil your night boys....................
Good post, but I can't see how not talking to RL is going to improve our results whatsoever. If there using that as an excuse its a bit pathetic.Hmm. Seems like an over-reaction from the club, probably due to our poor results. I heard the piece of commentary and as far as I remember it was nothing more than 'I haven't seen Nigel Pearson today, is he even at the match? We'll find out at half-time', as I remember not seeing Pearson at the Reading match when I glanced at the touchline I was quite interested to find out. Now I could definitely see how the club would be annoyed with some of his (probably naive) comments and tweets, re the Brown thing etc. and I could even see that they could get him suspended for a couple of matches, but not talking to Radio Leicester at all (which I believe they haven't for over a week?) especially when the station has been in a long sloppy anal kiss with the club over every difficult issue that fans want raised, seems like just touchiness on their part over the recent wobble in form.
(ETA: Of course, if this tactic leads to better results I'm not sure many people will complain)
I have heard him telling listeners that it was an awful decision NOT to give a penalty or NOT to send someone off. Problem is, he was arguing for a penalty to be given to the OPPOSITION or for one of OUR players to be sent off.
If you're a City fan, why sound so excited when the opposition score? Why sound like you want a City player to get booked or sent off? Why sound like that you want the opposition to score?
Eggsactly.
Couldn't have put it better (or possibly so well) myself. Stringer isn't perfect but, for we remote fans, he does a pretty good job.
Unless you at the match like I am every home game.
:icon_lol: How long will this go on for?
I find myself agreeing with BG. This must be startling for both of us.
Good post, but I can't see how not talking to RL is going to improve our results whatsoever. If there using that as an excuse its a bit pathetic.
Long live the Fourth Estate! (even if Stringer is a nob)
The only reason I could see is from a superstitious/attitude point-of-view (ie don't let the players hear the negative comments and/or Stringer constantly saying that we're nailed on for the playoffs), but it seemed like they were talking to the OS and the Merc still.
Pretty sure I caught the end of a Pearson interview on RL this morning so it seems the issue might be resolved?
Interesting that todays interview on Radio Leicester with Jack Hobbs wasn't done by Ian Stringer even though he was doing the sports round up on the evening news.
He did sound quite contrite and less exuberant than usual. I wonder what actually went on?
Its obvious Strings has been shagging Hobb's girlfriend ( she's a cracker by the way ) and is now out of the loop.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |