whoever chose the acts for the closing ceremony - Russell Brand and the Spice Girls.....
And it was his plonker that caused the trouble I believe. I know it's wrong to casually dismiss someone because of the way he looks, but he strikes me as a right pervy so-and-so.Assange, you plonker.
So he's decided to run the show his own way, fair enough, he's got well enough paid lawyers I suppose. What if they decide to charge him after interviewing him here? - I don't think he would be on the next Ryanair to Sweden , so the offer to be interviewed here is a bit of a waste of time in my opinion. Also what stinks to me is that the human rights of the complainants have been lost in the smokescreen Assange has created for himself. It's noteworthy that Jemima Khan ( I think ) who lost £20,000 as a result of him jumping bail, and was one of his strongest supporters, thinks he should go to Sweden to be questioned.Sweden offered the chance to interview Assange in England - they refused.
Sweden offered the chance to interview Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy - they refused.
Sweden offered the chance to interview Assange in England - they refused.
Sweden offered the chance to interview Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy - they refused.
Regardless of the whys and wherefores, his Wikileaks pages really embarrassed the Americans.
So he's decided to run the show his own way, fair enough, he's got well enough paid lawyers I suppose.
Also what stinks to me is that the human rights of the complainants have been lost in the smokescreen Assange has created for himself.
One of the complainants has apparently stated that she had never had unprotected sex before, and didn't want unprotected sex with Assange. He's a real freedom fighter isn't he?No, not his own way. Sweden routinely interviews suspects in other countries. It is Sweden that is making the exception in this case.
Really? The complainants that have accused him of having consensual sex without using a condom?
One of the complainants has apparently stated that she had never had unprotected sex before, and didn't want unprotected sex with Assange. He's a real freedom fighter isn't he?
Yeah, that's all true isn't it, 'cos it's on the internet. Even though it uses the word " may ". You can do better than that, Steven.:icon_winkThe one who is the CIA asset or not?
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/06/assange-rape-accuser-cia-ties/
And it was his plonker that caused the trouble I believe. I know it's wrong to casually dismiss someone because of the way he looks, but he strikes me as a right pervy so-and-so.
The one who is the CIA asset or not?
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/06/assange-rape-accuser-cia-ties/
The kind of people I usually meet have names like Blackie, Rashers, Badger, Bomber.
I should probably stop drinking flagons of cider on the park
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 16 | 39 |
2 | Chelsea | 17 | 35 |
3 | Arsenal | 17 | 33 |
4 | Nottm F | 17 | 31 |
5 | Bournemouth | 17 | 28 |
6 | Aston Villa | 17 | 28 |
7 | Manchester C | 17 | 27 |
8 | Newcastle | 17 | 26 |
9 | Fulham | 17 | 25 |
10 | Brighton | 17 | 25 |
11 | Tottenham | 17 | 23 |
12 | Brentford | 17 | 23 |
13 | Manchester U | 17 | 22 |
14 | West Ham | 17 | 20 |
15 | Everton | 16 | 16 |
16 | Palace | 17 | 16 |
17 | Leicester | 17 | 14 |
18 | Wolves | 17 | 12 |
19 | Ipswich | 17 | 12 |
20 | Southampton | 17 | 6 |